Hubble Space Telescope: Repair or Replace (1993)
by Anonymous
After Hubble launched with a flawed mirror, NASA had to decide between an expensive space shuttle repair mission or building a replacement. The daring repair mission succeeded and Hubble became the most productive scientific instrument ever.
Repair in Orbit (STS-61)
1993
year
~$700 million for repair mission
cost
Complex spacewalks, never done at this scale
risk
Chosen — fixed, Hubble operated for 30+ years
outcome
Build Replacement Telescope
1993
year
Billions, years of delay
cost
Low technical risk, high political risk
risk
Not chosen — too slow and expensive
outcome
Abandon Hubble
1993
year
None additional
cost
Massive PR disaster for NASA
risk
Not chosen — would have ended public support for space science
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
SpaceX: Reusable vs Expendable Rockets (2011)
Reusable First Stage vs Expendable (Industry Standard)
German Reunification: Fast vs Gradual (1990)
Rapid Reunification vs Gradual Integration vs Two-State Confederation
Korean War: Cross the 38th Parallel (1950)
Cross and Unify Korea vs Stop at 38th Parallel
Tesla: Build the Expensive Car First (2008)
Top-Down (Expensive First) vs Bottom-Up (Cheap First)
Cyrus the Great: Tolerance Decree (539 BCE)
Religious and Cultural Tolerance vs Forced Assimilation (Assyrian Model)
Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott Strategy (1955)
Economic Boycott vs Legal Challenge Only vs Violent Resistance