Hubble Space Telescope: Repair or Replace (1993)
by Anonymous
After Hubble launched with a flawed mirror, NASA had to decide between an expensive space shuttle repair mission or building a replacement. The daring repair mission succeeded and Hubble became the most productive scientific instrument ever.
Repair in Orbit (STS-61)
1993
year
~$700 million for repair mission
cost
Complex spacewalks, never done at this scale
risk
Chosen — fixed, Hubble operated for 30+ years
outcome
Build Replacement Telescope
1993
year
Billions, years of delay
cost
Low technical risk, high political risk
risk
Not chosen — too slow and expensive
outcome
Abandon Hubble
1993
year
None additional
cost
Massive PR disaster for NASA
risk
Not chosen — would have ended public support for space science
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Germany: Unification Under Prussia or Austria (1866)
Kleindeutschland (Prussian-led) vs Grossdeutschland (Including Austria)
Muhammad's Hijra: Stay in Mecca or Move to Medina (622 CE)
Migrate to Medina (Hijra) vs Remain in Mecca
Magna Carta: King John's Concession (1215)
Sign the Magna Carta vs Fight the Barons
Viking Settlement: Greenland Colonies (985 CE)
Settle Greenland's Fjords vs Return to Scandinavia vs Settle Further West (Vinland)
Genghis Khan: Unite the Mongol Tribes (1206)
Unite All Tribes as Genghis Khan vs Rule as Regional Clan Leader
European Coal and Steel Community: First Step to EU (1951)
Supranational Authority (ECSC) vs Traditional Bilateral Treaties