Wikipedia: Open Editing vs Expert-Written (2001)
by Anonymous
Jimmy Wales chose to let anyone edit Wikipedia rather than using credentialed experts (like Nupedia). Critics predicted chaos. Instead, the wisdom of crowds created the largest encyclopedia in history.
Open Editing (Anyone Can Edit)
2001
year
Crowdsourced, volunteer editors
editorial model
Explosive — millions of articles
growth rate
Chosen — 60M+ articles in 300+ languages
outcome
Expert-Written (Nupedia Model)
2000
year
PhD-level experts, peer review
editorial model
Glacial — 24 articles in first year
growth rate
Failed — became Wikipedia
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
OPEC Oil Embargo: Weapon or Commodity (1973)
Oil Embargo vs Maintain Normal Supply vs Production Cut (No Target)
Cuban Missile Crisis: Blockade vs Air Strike (1962)
Naval Blockade (Quarantine) vs Air Strikes on Missile Sites vs Full Invasion of Cuba
COVID-19 Vaccines: mRNA vs Traditional (2020)
mRNA Vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna) vs Viral Vector (AstraZeneca/J&J) vs Inactivated Virus (Sinovac/Sinopharm)
Cuban Revolution: Urban Guerrilla vs Rural Insurgency (1956)
Rural Insurgency (Foco Theory) vs Urban Guerrilla Warfare
Tesla: Build the Expensive Car First (2008)
Top-Down (Expensive First) vs Bottom-Up (Cheap First)
Columbus: West to Asia vs Known Routes (1492)
Sail West (Columbus's Plan) vs Portuguese Route Around Africa