Wikipedia: Open Editing vs Expert-Written (2001)
by Anonymous
Jimmy Wales chose to let anyone edit Wikipedia rather than using credentialed experts (like Nupedia). Critics predicted chaos. Instead, the wisdom of crowds created the largest encyclopedia in history.
Open Editing (Anyone Can Edit)
2001
year
Crowdsourced, volunteer editors
editorial model
Explosive — millions of articles
growth rate
Chosen — 60M+ articles in 300+ languages
outcome
Expert-Written (Nupedia Model)
2000
year
PhD-level experts, peer review
editorial model
Glacial — 24 articles in first year
growth rate
Failed — became Wikipedia
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Hong Kong Handover: One Country Two Systems (1984)
One Country, Two Systems vs Full Integration with China vs Extended British Lease
Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
Bottom-Up (NDCs) vs Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
Vietnam: Gulf of Tonkin Escalation (1964)
Full Military Escalation vs Limited Advisory Role vs Withdrawal
Martin Luther: Reform Within or Break Away (1517)
Stand Firm (Protestant Break) vs Recant and Reform from Within
VHS vs Betamax (1975-1988)
VHS (JVC) vs Betamax (Sony)
Fall of Constantinople: Cannon vs Walls (1453)
Massive Cannon Bombardment vs Traditional Siege (Starvation)