Wikipedia: Open Editing vs Expert-Written (2001)
by Anonymous
Jimmy Wales chose to let anyone edit Wikipedia rather than using credentialed experts (like Nupedia). Critics predicted chaos. Instead, the wisdom of crowds created the largest encyclopedia in history.
Open Editing (Anyone Can Edit)
2001
year
Crowdsourced, volunteer editors
editorial model
Explosive — millions of articles
growth rate
Chosen — 60M+ articles in 300+ languages
outcome
Expert-Written (Nupedia Model)
2000
year
PhD-level experts, peer review
editorial model
Glacial — 24 articles in first year
growth rate
Failed — became Wikipedia
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Bitcoin: Proof of Work vs Alternatives (2008)
Proof of Work vs Proof of Stake
Tesla: Build the Expensive Car First (2008)
Top-Down (Expensive First) vs Bottom-Up (Cheap First)
India: Partition or United India (1947)
Partition (Two States) vs United India vs Three-State Solution
Copernicus: Publish or Suppress (1543)
Publish (De revolutionibus) vs Suppress Findings
Charlemagne's Coronation: Emperor or King (800 CE)
Accept Imperial Crown vs Remain King of the Franks
Apple: Macintosh GUI vs Command Line (1984)
Graphical User Interface (Macintosh) vs Command Line Interface (DOS)