COVID-19 Vaccines: mRNA vs Traditional (2020)
by Anonymous
When COVID-19 struck, vaccine developers chose between proven traditional methods (inactivated virus, viral vector) and the untested-at-scale mRNA technology. Moderna and Pfizer's mRNA vaccines were the first to gain emergency authorization.
mRNA Vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna)
2020
year
11 months (record-breaking)
development speed
~95% against original strain
efficacy
First authorized — billions of doses administered
outcome
Viral Vector (AstraZeneca/J&J)
2020
year
12-14 months
development speed
60-70%
efficacy
Authorized — widely used globally
outcome
Inactivated Virus (Sinovac/Sinopharm)
2020
year
12-15 months
development speed
50-80%
efficacy
Used primarily in China and developing countries
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Napoleon: Invade Russia or Consolidate (1812)
Invade Russia vs Diplomatic Pressure and Blockade
Muhammad's Hijra: Stay in Mecca or Move to Medina (622 CE)
Migrate to Medina (Hijra) vs Remain in Mecca
Easter Island: Deforestation Decision (1400s)
Continue Deforestation vs Conserve Remaining Forest
Prohibition: Ban Alcohol or Regulate It (1920)
Total Prohibition (18th Amendment) vs Strict Regulation and Taxation
Amundsen vs Scott: South Pole Strategy (1911)
Dog Sleds and Ski (Amundsen) vs Ponies and Man-Hauling (Scott)
Henry VIII: Break with Rome (1534)
Create Church of England vs Accept Papal Decision