COVID-19 Vaccines: mRNA vs Traditional (2020)
by Anonymous
When COVID-19 struck, vaccine developers chose between proven traditional methods (inactivated virus, viral vector) and the untested-at-scale mRNA technology. Moderna and Pfizer's mRNA vaccines were the first to gain emergency authorization.
mRNA Vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna)
2020
year
11 months (record-breaking)
development speed
~95% against original strain
efficacy
First authorized — billions of doses administered
outcome
Viral Vector (AstraZeneca/J&J)
2020
year
12-14 months
development speed
60-70%
efficacy
Authorized — widely used globally
outcome
Inactivated Virus (Sinovac/Sinopharm)
2020
year
12-15 months
development speed
50-80%
efficacy
Used primarily in China and developing countries
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Glass-Steagall: Separate or Combined Banking (1933)
Separate Commercial and Investment Banking vs Self-Regulation
Panama Canal: Sea-Level vs Lock Design (1906)
Lock-Based Canal vs Sea-Level Canal
Metric System Adoption (1790s-ongoing)
Metric System vs Imperial/Customary Units
Netflix: Streaming vs DVD-by-Mail (2007)
Streaming (Netflix Pivot) vs DVD-by-Mail (Status Quo) vs Brick-and-Mortar Rental (Blockbuster)
Columbus: West to Asia vs Known Routes (1492)
Sail West (Columbus's Plan) vs Portuguese Route Around Africa
Constantine: Adopt Christianity (312 CE)
Embrace Christianity vs Maintain Traditional Roman Paganism