SpaceX: Reusable vs Expendable Rockets (2011)
by Anonymous
SpaceX bet on reusable rockets when the entire industry said it was impossible. After multiple failed landings, the Falcon 9 first stage landed successfully in 2015, reducing launch costs by an order of magnitude.
Reusable First Stage
2011-2015
year
$28 million (reused) vs $62M (new)
cost per launch
Impossible — every prior attempt failed
industry consensus
Succeeded — transformed space industry
outcome
Expendable (Industry Standard)
Standard
year
$100-400 million per launch
cost per launch
Proven, reliable
industry consensus
Being replaced by reusable rockets
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Dutch Golden Age: Trade vs Territorial Empire (1602)
Trading Empire (VOC) vs Territorial Empire
India: Partition or United India (1947)
Partition (Two States) vs United India vs Three-State Solution
Japan's Surrender: Emperor's Radio Broadcast (1945)
Accept Surrender (Emperor's Decision) vs Fight to the Last (Ketsu-Go)
The Crusades: Pope Urban II's Call to Arms (1095)
Holy Crusade to Jerusalem vs Send Military Aid to Byzantium vs Decline Byzantine Request
Marbury v. Madison: Judicial Review (1803)
Assert Judicial Review vs Defer to Congress
Constantine: Adopt Christianity (312 CE)
Embrace Christianity vs Maintain Traditional Roman Paganism