SpaceX: Reusable vs Expendable Rockets (2011)
by Anonymous
SpaceX bet on reusable rockets when the entire industry said it was impossible. After multiple failed landings, the Falcon 9 first stage landed successfully in 2015, reducing launch costs by an order of magnitude.
Reusable First Stage
2011-2015
year
$28 million (reused) vs $62M (new)
cost per launch
Impossible — every prior attempt failed
industry consensus
Succeeded — transformed space industry
outcome
Expendable (Industry Standard)
Standard
year
$100-400 million per launch
cost per launch
Proven, reliable
industry consensus
Being replaced by reusable rockets
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Y2K: Fix It Proactively or Wait and See (1995-1999)
Proactive Remediation vs Wait and Patch
Printing the Bible in Vernacular Languages (1520s)
Vernacular Translation vs Latin Only (Church Position)
Muhammad's Hijra: Stay in Mecca or Move to Medina (622 CE)
Migrate to Medina (Hijra) vs Remain in Mecca
Council of Nicaea: Nature of Christ (325 CE)
Homoousios (Same Substance as God) vs Arianism (Christ is Created)
Louisiana Purchase: Buy or Not (1803)
Buy Louisiana Territory vs Decline the Offer
Zheng He vs Columbus: Scale of Exploration (1405 vs 1492)
Zheng He's Treasure Fleet (China) vs Columbus's Expedition (Spain)