US Constitution: Virginia Plan vs New Jersey Plan (1787)
by Anonymous
The Constitutional Convention faced deadlock over representation. Large states wanted proportional representation (Virginia Plan), small states wanted equal representation (New Jersey Plan). The Connecticut Compromise combined both.
Virginia Plan (Proportional)
1787
year
Both chambers by population
representation model
Large states (VA, PA, MA)
who benefits
Partially adopted — House of Representatives
outcome
New Jersey Plan (Equal)
1787
year
Equal votes per state
representation model
Small states (NJ, DE, CT)
who benefits
Partially adopted — Senate
outcome
Connecticut Compromise (Both)
1787
year
House by population, Senate equal
representation model
Both large and small states
who benefits
Adopted — still the US system today
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Tower of Babel: Standardize or Diversify Programming Languages (1960s)
One Universal Language (PL/I) vs Domain-Specific Languages
MLK: March on Washington Strategy (1963)
March on Washington vs Focus on Local Actions
Apple: Macintosh GUI vs Command Line (1984)
Graphical User Interface (Macintosh) vs Command Line Interface (DOS)
Hubble Space Telescope: Repair or Replace (1993)
Repair in Orbit (STS-61) vs Build Replacement Telescope vs Abandon Hubble
Akbar the Great: Religious Tolerance Policy (1562)
Religious Tolerance (Sulh-i-Kul) vs Enforce Islamic Orthodoxy
World Wide Web: Free and Open vs Proprietary (1993)
Free and Open (No Royalties) vs Licensed/Proprietary