US Constitution: Virginia Plan vs New Jersey Plan (1787)
by Anonymous
The Constitutional Convention faced deadlock over representation. Large states wanted proportional representation (Virginia Plan), small states wanted equal representation (New Jersey Plan). The Connecticut Compromise combined both.
Virginia Plan (Proportional)
1787
year
Both chambers by population
representation model
Large states (VA, PA, MA)
who benefits
Partially adopted — House of Representatives
outcome
New Jersey Plan (Equal)
1787
year
Equal votes per state
representation model
Small states (NJ, DE, CT)
who benefits
Partially adopted — Senate
outcome
Connecticut Compromise (Both)
1787
year
House by population, Senate equal
representation model
Both large and small states
who benefits
Adopted — still the US system today
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Dutch Golden Age: Trade vs Territorial Empire (1602)
Trading Empire (VOC) vs Territorial Empire
VHS vs Betamax (1975-1988)
VHS (JVC) vs Betamax (Sony)
Israel: Declare Statehood or Wait (1948)
Declare Independence Immediately vs Delay and Negotiate
Korean War: Cross the 38th Parallel (1950)
Cross and Unify Korea vs Stop at 38th Parallel
Spartacus: March on Rome or Escape Over Alps (73 BCE)
Stay in Italy and Fight vs Escape Over the Alps
Viking Settlement: Greenland Colonies (985 CE)
Settle Greenland's Fjords vs Return to Scandinavia vs Settle Further West (Vinland)