Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
by Anonymous
After the failure of Kyoto's binding top-down targets, the Paris Agreement chose a bottom-up approach where each nation sets its own targets (NDCs). This got universal participation but with weaker enforcement.
Bottom-Up (NDCs)
2015
year
Each nation sets own targets, review every 5 years
approach
195 countries signed
participation
Chosen — universal but voluntary, targets insufficient
outcome
Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
2015
year
Binding emissions limits per country
approach
Major emitters refused to join Kyoto
participation
Not chosen — learned from Kyoto's failure
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Roman Capital: Rome vs Byzantium (330 CE)
Constantinople (Byzantium) vs Keep Rome as Capital vs Nicomedia
Fall of Constantinople: Cannon vs Walls (1453)
Massive Cannon Bombardment vs Traditional Siege (Starvation)
Glass-Steagall: Separate or Combined Banking (1933)
Separate Commercial and Investment Banking vs Self-Regulation
Wikipedia: Open Editing vs Expert-Written (2001)
Open Editing (Anyone Can Edit) vs Expert-Written (Nupedia Model)
Dutch Golden Age: Trade vs Territorial Empire (1602)
Trading Empire (VOC) vs Territorial Empire
Olympics: Athens Revival (1896)
Athens, Greece vs Paris, France