Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
by Anonymous
After the failure of Kyoto's binding top-down targets, the Paris Agreement chose a bottom-up approach where each nation sets its own targets (NDCs). This got universal participation but with weaker enforcement.
Bottom-Up (NDCs)
2015
year
Each nation sets own targets, review every 5 years
approach
195 countries signed
participation
Chosen — universal but voluntary, targets insufficient
outcome
Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
2015
year
Binding emissions limits per country
approach
Major emitters refused to join Kyoto
participation
Not chosen — learned from Kyoto's failure
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Google: PageRank vs Directory Model (1998)
PageRank (Algorithmic) vs Human-Curated Directory (Yahoo) vs Keyword Matching (AltaVista)
Chernobyl: Response Strategy (1986)
Information Suppression (Chosen) vs Immediate Transparency and Evacuation
The Crusades: Pope Urban II's Call to Arms (1095)
Holy Crusade to Jerusalem vs Send Military Aid to Byzantium vs Decline Byzantine Request
US Interstate Highway System vs Rail (1956)
Interstate Highway System vs National Passenger Rail Network vs Mixed Investment (Both)
Standard Oil Breakup: Regulate or Dissolve (1911)
Dissolve into 34 Companies vs Regulate as Utility
Bretton Woods: Dollar Standard vs Bancor (1944)
Dollar as Reserve Currency vs Bancor (International Currency)