Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
by Anonymous
After the failure of Kyoto's binding top-down targets, the Paris Agreement chose a bottom-up approach where each nation sets its own targets (NDCs). This got universal participation but with weaker enforcement.
Bottom-Up (NDCs)
2015
year
Each nation sets own targets, review every 5 years
approach
195 countries signed
participation
Chosen — universal but voluntary, targets insufficient
outcome
Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
2015
year
Binding emissions limits per country
approach
Major emitters refused to join Kyoto
participation
Not chosen — learned from Kyoto's failure
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Galileo's Choice: Recant or Stand Firm (1633)
Recant Publicly vs Refuse to Recant
South Africa: Negotiation vs Armed Struggle (1990)
Negotiated Transition vs Continued Armed Struggle vs Maintain Apartheid
Cuban Missile Crisis: Blockade vs Air Strike (1962)
Naval Blockade (Quarantine) vs Air Strikes on Missile Sites vs Full Invasion of Cuba
NASA Moon Program: Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (1962)
Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (LOR) vs Direct Ascent (Nova Rocket) vs Earth Orbit Rendezvous (EOR)
Great Wall: Build or Negotiate with Nomads (3rd Century BCE - 17th Century)
Build the Great Wall vs Heqin (Marriage Alliance and Tribute)
William the Conqueror: Invade England or Stay in Normandy (1066)
Invade England vs Press Diplomatic Claim vs Accept the Situation