Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
by Anonymous
After the failure of Kyoto's binding top-down targets, the Paris Agreement chose a bottom-up approach where each nation sets its own targets (NDCs). This got universal participation but with weaker enforcement.
Bottom-Up (NDCs)
2015
year
Each nation sets own targets, review every 5 years
approach
195 countries signed
participation
Chosen — universal but voluntary, targets insufficient
outcome
Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
2015
year
Binding emissions limits per country
approach
Major emitters refused to join Kyoto
participation
Not chosen — learned from Kyoto's failure
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
India: Partition or United India (1947)
Partition (Two States) vs United India vs Three-State Solution
Chernobyl: Response Strategy (1986)
Information Suppression (Chosen) vs Immediate Transparency and Evacuation
Penicillin: Mass Production Method (1941)
Deep-Tank Fermentation vs Surface Culture (Bottles)
Edison vs Tesla: AC vs DC Electricity (1880s)
Alternating Current (AC) vs Direct Current (DC)
Caesar: Cross the Rubicon or Obey the Senate (49 BCE)
Cross the Rubicon vs Obey the Senate
Galileo's Choice: Recant or Stand Firm (1633)
Recant Publicly vs Refuse to Recant