Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
by Anonymous
After the failure of Kyoto's binding top-down targets, the Paris Agreement chose a bottom-up approach where each nation sets its own targets (NDCs). This got universal participation but with weaker enforcement.
Bottom-Up (NDCs)
2015
year
Each nation sets own targets, review every 5 years
approach
195 countries signed
participation
Chosen — universal but voluntary, targets insufficient
outcome
Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
2015
year
Binding emissions limits per country
approach
Major emitters refused to join Kyoto
participation
Not chosen — learned from Kyoto's failure
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Amundsen vs Scott: South Pole Strategy (1911)
Dog Sleds and Ski (Amundsen) vs Ponies and Man-Hauling (Scott)
Zheng He vs Columbus: Scale of Exploration (1405 vs 1492)
Zheng He's Treasure Fleet (China) vs Columbus's Expedition (Spain)
Glass-Steagall: Separate or Combined Banking (1933)
Separate Commercial and Investment Banking vs Self-Regulation
Roosevelt: New Deal or Austerity (1933)
New Deal (Government Intervention) vs Austerity (Hoover's Approach)
Charlemagne's Coronation: Emperor or King (800 CE)
Accept Imperial Crown vs Remain King of the Franks
Lewis and Clark: Northern vs Southern Route (1805)
Lemhi Pass (Northern Route) vs Direct Western Crossing