Hannibal's Route to Rome (218 BCE)
by Anonymous
Hannibal needed to bring the war to Rome's doorstep. He could take the safe sea route, march along the coast, or attempt the seemingly impossible crossing of the Alps with elephants.
Cross the Alps
218 BCE
year
Extreme — lost half his army
risk level
Total — Romans never expected it
surprise factor
Chosen — shocked Rome, won early battles
outcome
Coastal March through Gaul
218 BCE
year
Moderate
risk level
None — Roman navy could intercept
surprise factor
Not chosen
outcome
Naval Invasion
218 BCE
year
High — Carthage had weaker navy
risk level
Low
surprise factor
Not chosen — Rome controlled the sea
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Cuban Revolution: Urban Guerrilla vs Rural Insurgency (1956)
Rural Insurgency (Foco Theory) vs Urban Guerrilla Warfare
Abolition of the Slave Trade: Economic Pressure vs Moral Argument (1807)
Moral + Economic Argument Combined vs Moral Argument Alone vs Gradual Phase-Out
Suez Canal: Route Selection (1858)
Direct Sea-Level Canal vs Indirect Route with Locks
Alexander the Great: Pursue Darius or Turn South (331 BCE)
Capture Babylon and Persepolis First vs Pursue Darius Immediately
OPEC Oil Embargo: Weapon or Commodity (1973)
Oil Embargo vs Maintain Normal Supply vs Production Cut (No Target)
Manhattan Project: Bomb Design (1943)
Gun-Type (Little Boy) vs Implosion (Fat Man)