Hannibal's Route to Rome (218 BCE)
by Anonymous
Hannibal needed to bring the war to Rome's doorstep. He could take the safe sea route, march along the coast, or attempt the seemingly impossible crossing of the Alps with elephants.
Cross the Alps
218 BCE
year
Extreme — lost half his army
risk level
Total — Romans never expected it
surprise factor
Chosen — shocked Rome, won early battles
outcome
Coastal March through Gaul
218 BCE
year
Moderate
risk level
None — Roman navy could intercept
surprise factor
Not chosen
outcome
Naval Invasion
218 BCE
year
High — Carthage had weaker navy
risk level
Low
surprise factor
Not chosen — Rome controlled the sea
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Germany: Unification Under Prussia or Austria (1866)
Kleindeutschland (Prussian-led) vs Grossdeutschland (Including Austria)
Google: PageRank vs Directory Model (1998)
PageRank (Algorithmic) vs Human-Curated Directory (Yahoo) vs Keyword Matching (AltaVista)
Cuban Missile Crisis: Blockade vs Air Strike (1962)
Naval Blockade (Quarantine) vs Air Strikes on Missile Sites vs Full Invasion of Cuba
Suez Canal: Route Selection (1858)
Direct Sea-Level Canal vs Indirect Route with Locks
Paris Climate Agreement: Bottom-Up vs Top-Down (2015)
Bottom-Up (NDCs) vs Top-Down Binding Targets (Kyoto-style)
King James Bible: Translation Approach (1604)
Formal Equivalence (Majestic English) vs Strict Literal Translation