Cuban Missile Crisis: Blockade vs Air Strike (1962)
by Anonymous
Kennedy's advisors were split. Hawks wanted air strikes on Cuban missile sites. Kennedy chose a naval blockade (quarantine), giving Khrushchev time to back down without losing face.
Naval Blockade (Quarantine)
1962
year
Moderate — proportional response
escalation risk
Bought time for diplomacy
time pressure
Chosen — Soviets withdrew missiles
outcome
Air Strikes on Missile Sites
1962
year
Very high — could kill Soviet personnel
escalation risk
Immediate action
time pressure
Not chosen — too likely to start WWIII
outcome
Full Invasion of Cuba
1962
year
Extreme
escalation risk
Would take weeks to prepare
time pressure
Not chosen
outcome
Do Nothing / Diplomatic Protest
1962
year
Low
escalation risk
None
time pressure
Not chosen — missiles would become operational
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Chernobyl: Response Strategy (1986)
Information Suppression (Chosen) vs Immediate Transparency and Evacuation
American Expansion: Seward's Purchase of Alaska (1867)
Buy Alaska vs Decline the Offer
Columbus: West to Asia vs Known Routes (1492)
Sail West (Columbus's Plan) vs Portuguese Route Around Africa
Netflix: Streaming vs DVD-by-Mail (2007)
Streaming (Netflix Pivot) vs DVD-by-Mail (Status Quo) vs Brick-and-Mortar Rental (Blockbuster)
Sydney Opera House: Utzon's Design (1957)
Utzon's Sail Design vs Conventional Concert Hall
Berlin Airlift: Supply by Air vs Abandon West Berlin (1948)
Airlift (Operation Vittles) vs Military Convoy Through Soviet Zone vs Abandon West Berlin