William the Conqueror: Invade England or Stay in Normandy (1066)
by Anonymous
When Harold Godwinson took the English throne, William of Normandy claimed it was rightfully his. He gambled everything on a risky Channel crossing and invasion.
Invade England
1066
year
Extremely high — Channel crossing, hostile territory
military risk
The English crown
potential reward
Won at Hastings — became King of England
outcome
Press Diplomatic Claim
1066
year
None
military risk
Unlikely to succeed — Harold had the throne
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Accept the Situation
1066
year
None
military risk
Remain Duke of Normandy
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Abolition: Gradual Emancipation vs Immediate (1830s-1860s)
Immediate Abolition vs Gradual Emancipation vs Popular Sovereignty (Let States Decide)
United Nations Headquarters Location (1946)
New York City vs Philadelphia vs San Francisco
Y2K: Fix It Proactively or Wait and See (1995-1999)
Proactive Remediation vs Wait and Patch
MLK: March on Washington Strategy (1963)
March on Washington vs Focus on Local Actions
Abolition of the Slave Trade: Economic Pressure vs Moral Argument (1807)
Moral + Economic Argument Combined vs Moral Argument Alone vs Gradual Phase-Out
Ford: Assembly Line vs Craft Production (1913)
Moving Assembly Line vs Traditional Craft Production