William the Conqueror: Invade England or Stay in Normandy (1066)
by Anonymous
When Harold Godwinson took the English throne, William of Normandy claimed it was rightfully his. He gambled everything on a risky Channel crossing and invasion.
Invade England
1066
year
Extremely high — Channel crossing, hostile territory
military risk
The English crown
potential reward
Won at Hastings — became King of England
outcome
Press Diplomatic Claim
1066
year
None
military risk
Unlikely to succeed — Harold had the throne
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Accept the Situation
1066
year
None
military risk
Remain Duke of Normandy
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
United Nations Headquarters Location (1946)
New York City vs Philadelphia vs San Francisco
King James Bible: Translation Approach (1604)
Formal Equivalence (Majestic English) vs Strict Literal Translation
Prohibition: Ban Alcohol or Regulate It (1920)
Total Prohibition (18th Amendment) vs Strict Regulation and Taxation
Jamestown vs Plymouth: England's American Strategy (1607-1620)
Jamestown (Commercial Colony) vs Plymouth (Religious Colony)
SpaceX: Reusable vs Expendable Rockets (2011)
Reusable First Stage vs Expendable (Industry Standard)
Qin Shi Huang: Unify or Federate China (221 BCE)
Centralized Empire vs Feudal Federation