William the Conqueror: Invade England or Stay in Normandy (1066)
by Anonymous
When Harold Godwinson took the English throne, William of Normandy claimed it was rightfully his. He gambled everything on a risky Channel crossing and invasion.
Invade England
1066
year
Extremely high — Channel crossing, hostile territory
military risk
The English crown
potential reward
Won at Hastings — became King of England
outcome
Press Diplomatic Claim
1066
year
None
military risk
Unlikely to succeed — Harold had the throne
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Accept the Situation
1066
year
None
military risk
Remain Duke of Normandy
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Galileo's Choice: Recant or Stand Firm (1633)
Recant Publicly vs Refuse to Recant
Fall of Constantinople: Cannon vs Walls (1453)
Massive Cannon Bombardment vs Traditional Siege (Starvation)
King James Bible: Translation Approach (1604)
Formal Equivalence (Majestic English) vs Strict Literal Translation
Abolition: Gradual Emancipation vs Immediate (1830s-1860s)
Immediate Abolition vs Gradual Emancipation vs Popular Sovereignty (Let States Decide)
Easter Island: Deforestation Decision (1400s)
Continue Deforestation vs Conserve Remaining Forest
Moon Landing: Apollo 11 Landing Site (1969)
Sea of Tranquility vs Sinus Medii (Central Bay) vs Ocean of Storms