William the Conqueror: Invade England or Stay in Normandy (1066)
by Anonymous
When Harold Godwinson took the English throne, William of Normandy claimed it was rightfully his. He gambled everything on a risky Channel crossing and invasion.
Invade England
1066
year
Extremely high — Channel crossing, hostile territory
military risk
The English crown
potential reward
Won at Hastings — became King of England
outcome
Press Diplomatic Claim
1066
year
None
military risk
Unlikely to succeed — Harold had the throne
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Accept the Situation
1066
year
None
military risk
Remain Duke of Normandy
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Henry VIII: Break with Rome (1534)
Create Church of England vs Accept Papal Decision
Ming Dynasty: End the Treasure Voyages (1433)
End the Voyages (Haijin) vs Continue Maritime Expansion
Britain: Appeasement vs Confrontation with Hitler (1938)
Appeasement (Munich Agreement) vs Military Confrontation
King James Bible: Translation Approach (1604)
Formal Equivalence (Majestic English) vs Strict Literal Translation
Florence: Medici Banking Innovation (1397)
Financial Innovation (Bills of Exchange) vs Traditional Lending
SpaceX: Reusable vs Expendable Rockets (2011)
Reusable First Stage vs Expendable (Industry Standard)