William the Conqueror: Invade England or Stay in Normandy (1066)
by Anonymous
When Harold Godwinson took the English throne, William of Normandy claimed it was rightfully his. He gambled everything on a risky Channel crossing and invasion.
Invade England
1066
year
Extremely high — Channel crossing, hostile territory
military risk
The English crown
potential reward
Won at Hastings — became King of England
outcome
Press Diplomatic Claim
1066
year
None
military risk
Unlikely to succeed — Harold had the throne
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Accept the Situation
1066
year
None
military risk
Remain Duke of Normandy
potential reward
Not chosen
outcome
Want to make your own version?
Sign up to create your ownMore in History
Great Wall: Build or Negotiate with Nomads (3rd Century BCE - 17th Century)
Build the Great Wall vs Heqin (Marriage Alliance and Tribute)
American Expansion: Seward's Purchase of Alaska (1867)
Buy Alaska vs Decline the Offer
Berlin Airlift: Supply by Air vs Abandon West Berlin (1948)
Airlift (Operation Vittles) vs Military Convoy Through Soviet Zone vs Abandon West Berlin
European Union: Maastricht Treaty (1992)
Deep Integration (EU + Euro) vs Economic Community Only
China: Deng Xiaoping's Economic Reforms (1978)
Reform and Opening Up vs Continue Maoist Economics vs Full Liberalization (Soviet-style)
Penicillin Patent: Fleming's Choice Not to Patent (1928)
No Patent (Free for All) vs Patent It