Tower of Babel: Standardize or Diversify Programming Languages (1960s)
by Anonymous
In computing's early decades, the industry debated whether to standardize on one universal language (like COBOL or PL/I) or let many languages flourish. IBM pushed PL/I as the one language to rule them all. The market chose diversity.
One Universal Language (PL/I)
1960s
decade
Single language for all purposes
approach
IBM
key advocate
Failed — too complex, pleased nobody fully
outcome
Domain-Specific Languages
1960s
decade
Different languages for different tasks
approach
The market
key advocate
Won — COBOL for business, Fortran for science, C for systems
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
COVID-19 Vaccines: mRNA vs Traditional (2020)
mRNA Vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna) vs Viral Vector (AstraZeneca/J&J) vs Inactivated Virus (Sinovac/Sinopharm)
Roosevelt: New Deal or Austerity (1933)
New Deal (Government Intervention) vs Austerity (Hoover's Approach)
Penicillin Patent: Fleming's Choice Not to Patent (1928)
No Patent (Free for All) vs Patent It
Turing: Breaking Enigma Methodology (1939)
Electromechanical Machine (Bombe) vs Mathematical Analysis Alone vs Rely on Captured Codebooks
Spanish Armada: Philip II's Invasion Plan (1588)
Combined Naval-Army Invasion vs Direct Naval Assault vs Postpone and Blockade
Manhattan Project: Bomb Design (1943)
Gun-Type (Little Boy) vs Implosion (Fat Man)