Tower of Babel: Standardize or Diversify Programming Languages (1960s)
by Anonymous
In computing's early decades, the industry debated whether to standardize on one universal language (like COBOL or PL/I) or let many languages flourish. IBM pushed PL/I as the one language to rule them all. The market chose diversity.
One Universal Language (PL/I)
1960s
decade
Single language for all purposes
approach
IBM
key advocate
Failed — too complex, pleased nobody fully
outcome
Domain-Specific Languages
1960s
decade
Different languages for different tasks
approach
The market
key advocate
Won — COBOL for business, Fortran for science, C for systems
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
D-Day: Normandy vs Pas-de-Calais (1944)
Normandy vs Pas-de-Calais vs Norway
Truman: Drop the Atomic Bomb or Invade Japan (1945)
Drop the Atomic Bomb vs Operation Downfall (Invasion) vs Continued Blockade and Bombing
Genghis Khan: Unite the Mongol Tribes (1206)
Unite All Tribes as Genghis Khan vs Rule as Regional Clan Leader
Blu-ray vs HD DVD (2006-2008)
Blu-ray (Sony) vs HD DVD (Toshiba)
Florence: Medici Banking Innovation (1397)
Financial Innovation (Bills of Exchange) vs Traditional Lending
Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott Strategy (1955)
Economic Boycott vs Legal Challenge Only vs Violent Resistance