Tower of Babel: Standardize or Diversify Programming Languages (1960s)
by Anonymous
In computing's early decades, the industry debated whether to standardize on one universal language (like COBOL or PL/I) or let many languages flourish. IBM pushed PL/I as the one language to rule them all. The market chose diversity.
One Universal Language (PL/I)
1960s
decade
Single language for all purposes
approach
IBM
key advocate
Failed — too complex, pleased nobody fully
outcome
Domain-Specific Languages
1960s
decade
Different languages for different tasks
approach
The market
key advocate
Won — COBOL for business, Fortran for science, C for systems
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
Cyrus the Great: Tolerance Decree (539 BCE)
Religious and Cultural Tolerance vs Forced Assimilation (Assyrian Model)
Hubble Space Telescope: Repair or Replace (1993)
Repair in Orbit (STS-61) vs Build Replacement Telescope vs Abandon Hubble
Muhammad's Hijra: Stay in Mecca or Move to Medina (622 CE)
Migrate to Medina (Hijra) vs Remain in Mecca
Vaccination Mandate: Smallpox (Massachusetts, 1809)
Mandatory Vaccination vs Voluntary Vaccination
Jenner: Vaccination vs Variolation (1796)
Vaccination (Cowpox) vs Variolation (Smallpox) vs No Intervention
Penicillin Patent: Fleming's Choice Not to Patent (1928)
No Patent (Free for All) vs Patent It