Panama Canal: Sea-Level vs Lock Design (1906)
by Anonymous
The French had failed building a sea-level canal. The Americans debated the same approach vs a lock-based design that would be easier to build. Chief Engineer John Stevens convinced Roosevelt to choose locks.
Lock-Based Canal
1906
year
Create artificial lake (Gatun), build locks
engineering challenge
~$375 million (1914 dollars)
cost
Chosen — opened 1914, still operating
outcome
Sea-Level Canal
1906
year
Excavate to sea level through mountains
engineering challenge
Far more expensive, decades longer
cost
Not chosen — French failure proved it impractical
outcome
Like this comparison? Make it your own.
Sign up to use as templateMore in History
King James Bible: Translation Approach (1604)
Formal Equivalence (Majestic English) vs Strict Literal Translation
Galileo's Choice: Recant or Stand Firm (1633)
Recant Publicly vs Refuse to Recant
Israel: Declare Statehood or Wait (1948)
Declare Independence Immediately vs Delay and Negotiate
Spartacus: March on Rome or Escape Over Alps (73 BCE)
Stay in Italy and Fight vs Escape Over the Alps
OPEC Oil Embargo: Weapon or Commodity (1973)
Oil Embargo vs Maintain Normal Supply vs Production Cut (No Target)
Fall of Constantinople: Cannon vs Walls (1453)
Massive Cannon Bombardment vs Traditional Siege (Starvation)